Eight Values Blog Post

 

Insperity

Promoting Innovation

Among all of the Eight Values of Free Expression, I believe that Promoting Innovation has been and will be the most important factor in developing the United States as a nation. Innovation can come in various forms, from something as simple as creating a new flavor of OREO to creating a new rocket for NASA to take to the moon. Since the birth of the U.S., innovation has paved the way for so many unique ideas and systems, and society as we know it today would be drastically different had we not taken risks in modernization over the last 250 years.

Early Days

Not long after the Declaration of Independence was signed, the new founders of America wasted no time developing various aspects of society. Inventions like the cotton gin and the telegraph were vital to the early-stage development of American culture. These inventions provided a foundation to show that America could thrive and develop on its own, and had the goal of growing each and every year exponentially. Then came the development of canals and railroads, which changed the course of transportation and the distance that people had to cover in this new country. From there, places that fostered the growth of the mind were established, as institutions for science and universities started to become a main component of society.

Industrialization

New York Times

The industrialization boom hit America fast and hard. From the development of railroads and textile mills to the production of steel and oil companies, there was no stopping the innovation and development once it hit the ground running in the USA. Innovation was always the key form of development for society, and the U.S. took full advantage of this concept when trying to become a world power.

Wars

It was no secret that if a country develops as rapidly as the U.S. did in a compressed time period of about 150 years, there was going to be war. The U.S. had built itself up enough to become a world power, and while it still wanted to expand and grow internally, it also knew that it had the power and respect to be a main contributor to world wars. Although the U.S. participated in World War 1, it wasn't really until the attack on Pearl Harbor that the U.S. got its foot in the door. This attack sparked outrage across the nation and prompted the U.S. to not just join, but become a crucial part of the victory in WWII. This not only put the U.S. on the global map, but also led to the globalization of its society and cultural norms

Transition to Present Day

Time

WWII was a launching pad for what the U.S. is known for today, both internally and externally. The Cold War followed next, and the development of technology for the space race and other wartime activities prompted a focus on technology in the nation that is still ever-growing today. From airplanes to cars and computers and phones, the last 50 years in America have seen an astounding amount of growth that has essentially separated the U.S. from every other country. In today's age, America has a diverse society with people who possess all different skill sets. Some are experts in politics and government, while some are gifted athletically, and some are smart financially. The U.S. has so many different parts of society that have all come together over the last 250 years to create a force to be reckoned with.

Why Innovation?

Overall, innovation has always been a driving force behind the development of society in America. Without the various elements of society that have resulted from innovation, the U.S. would not still be a nation today. From the early beginnings when a few founding fathers decided to create a new country, to the present day, where 340 million people coexist under one nation, America has and will thrive off of innovation for years to come.

The Frederick Douglass Game

 

John Jay Portrait

"Prayers to Heaven for Liberty Will Be Impious": John Jay Speaks

I am John Jay of New York — first Chief Justice of the United States, a writer of the Federalist, Governor of my state, and, from 1785 until I took the bench in 1789, president of the New-York Society for Promoting the Manumission of Slaves. I helped build the Constitution that men now hold up as slavery's shield. I ask you to hear me out, because I know what was in that room, and I know what was in my own heart when I signed my name to the American cause.

What I Wrote When No One Was Listening

In September of 1780 I sat in Spain, begging a monarch for money to fund our revolution, and I wrote home to my friend Egbert Benson about the only thing I could not stop turning over: "Till America comes into this Measure, her Prayers to Heaven for Liberty will be impious. This is a strong Expression, but it is just."

I meant every word of it then and I mean it now. Impious. Not impolitic. Not unfortunate. Blasphemous. A nation on its knees asking God for freedom while its hand is clamped over another man's mouth is not praying — it is performing. Five years later I put it to Dr. Richard Price more plainly: that men should pray and fight for their own freedom and yet keep others in slavery is inconsistent, unjust, and perhaps impious. And to Richard Lushington: to contend for our own liberty and deny that blessing to others involves an inconsistency not to be excused.

Not to be excused. Hear that, gentlemen who quote me at your dinner tables. 

My Own Hands Were Not Clean

Gradual Abolition Act

I will not stand here and pretend to a purity I never possessed. I owned men, and I defended it this way: I purchase slaves and manumit them at proper ages, when their faithful services have afforded a reasonable retribution. Read that sentence again and notice what it does. It makes a man pay for his own freedom in advance, in labor, to the very person who had no right to take it. Yet I wrote into Benoit's manumission paper that the children of men are by nature equally free and cannot without injustice be held in slavery. I knew the principle. I applied it on my own schedule.

So when the abolitionist in this hall says gradualism is a comfortable bed for a guilty conscience, he is describing me. I do not deny the charge. I offer it as testimony. If a man who saw the wrong that clearly still moved that slowly, what shall we say of a nation that has now had seventy years and grown only more defiant?

The Constitution Is Not a Tomb

They tell you the Constitution settles it. I was there. We wrote a frame of government, not a scripture, and we built into it the means of its own amendment because we knew we were fallible men working under the pressure of the hour. In 1799 I signed New York's Act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery, because law is a thing that can be changed by men who decide to change it.

So do not hide behind my generation. We failed to finish it. That work now falls to you, and there is no clause anywhere that excuses you from it.

AI DISCLOSURE: AI was used extensively in this assignment. I did ample research across multiple sources about the figure I chose, John Jay. I then personalized this research by adding my point of view, for example, things I found surprising or interesting about what I learned. I then used Claude AI to help me draft a script and then clean up the text for grammar, spelling, and punctuation. I also asked the tool to help me shape it into the form of a blog post. I then edited the text, added links, and added images and captions. 

Bible Team Challenge

Slavery in the Bible

    In my Talking About Freedom class, we were asked to write a blog post with a partner about whether or not slavery was accepted or condemned in the bible. Below, you can read the research that states where the bible argues for and against slavery. Two points of view in the same fascinating book.

Argument for Slavery:

    Slavery is either permitted or tolerated in many passages throughout the Bible. It is no secret that most, if not every society throughout history, has accepted slavery at some point in its timeline. For centuries, slavery was viewed as the most efficient form of cheap labor that gave slave owners both money and control. 

    Even in the bible, the use of slavery is permitted in various passages. In the Old Testament, Leviticus 25:44-46 allows Israelites to acquire slaves from surrounding nations. Deuteronomy 15 also discusses releasing Hebrew servants after a certain period of service. Pro-slavery thinkers argued that God regulated slavery instead of outright denouncing it, meaning it could not have been sinful. These verses and passages don’t specifically outlaw slavery, but instead detail regulations for owning slaves. 

    Other verses, however, flat-out accept the practice. In the New Testament, verses such as Ephesians 6:5 and 1 Peter 2:18 explicitly instruct slaves to obey their masters. It is argued that if slaves were directly addressed and instructed to obey their masters, then slavery must have been acceptable within Christianity. 

Slavery in the Bible

Argument Against Slavery:

    Slavery has existed in nearly every society throughout history, and religious traditions have often been used to justify it. Yet a closer reading of the Bible reveals passages in both testaments that speak directly against the practice.

    In Exodus 21:16, the law states plainly: "Anyone who kidnaps a person and sells them, or is caught holding them, must be put to death." Kidnapping and selling a person is treated not as a regulated practice, but as a capital crime.

    Deuteronomy 23:15–16 addresses a person who has escaped bondage, instructing: "You shall not give up to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you." The escapee "shall dwell with you, in your midst... wherever it suits him. You shall not wrong him," This is shown as protection rather than a mandate to return them to captivity.

    In the New Testament, 1 Timothy 1:8–10 affirms that "the law is good if one uses it properly," then lists those the law exists for: lawbreakers, murderers, and others acting contrary to sound doctrine among them, "slave traders." The book of Philemon has often been read as pointing toward a broader shift, away from ownership and toward brotherhood.

    Together, these passages form a pattern, not an exception: a consistent stance against slavery within the biblical record.

Reflection:

    The Bible is a fascinating book, which was written over a long period of time from various different perspectives. As a result of this, the practice of slavery is both debated and accepted throughout the book, making the issue of slavery that much more polarizing.

AI DISCLOSURE: AI was used in a limited way in this assignment. I did ample research across multiple sources about slavery throughout the Bible. I then personalized this research by adding my point of view, for example, things I found surprising or interesting about what I learned. I then used Claude AI to help me clean up the text for grammar, spelling, and punctuation. I also asked the tool to help me shape it into the form of a blog post. I then edited the text, added links, and added images and captions. 

Supreme Court Video Reflection

Supreme Court Video Notes

Inside the Nation's Highest Court: What I Learned

Every year, thousands of petitions land on the desks of the U.S. Supreme Court. Some are small — a prisoner asking for a pardon. Others are massive, touching the presidency itself.

That range says a lot.

The Supreme Court, it turns out, is the most powerful judicial body in the world.

Its history stretches back through more than 100 justices. On average, each serves about 16 years on the bench. And apparently, it takes a new justice a few years just to settle in.

John Marshall, a lawyer from Virginia, became the first chief justice in 1801. He's remembered for Marbury v. Madison — the case that helped the Court earn the nation's early respect.

Not every chapter was so admirable.

Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney presided over the Dred Scott decision, tied directly to slavery and the lead-up to the Civil War. Historians still call it the Court's biggest self-inflicted wound.

Fast forward to today.

The Court now receives more than 7,000 cases a year — roughly 100 a week. It accepts only about 100 of those for full consideration.

For the cases that do make it, lawyers get just 30 minutes per side to argue. No witnesses. No new evidence. Just argument.

Within a few days, the justices meet privately to discuss the case. Once a decision is reached, the Court's Public Information Officer notifies the public.

One justice is assigned to write the majority opinion. Any other justice, if they disagree, can write a dissent.

And by longstanding tradition, the Court releases every outstanding decision by the end of its term each June.

Two centuries. A little over 100 names. One enormous amount of power.

That's the Supreme Court, in brief.

AI DISCLOSURE: AI was used in a limited way in this assignment. I took ample notes while watching a 20-minute video about the U.S. Supreme Court. I then personalized those notes by adding my point of view, for example, things I found surprising or interesting about what I learned. I then used Claude AI to help me clean up the text for grammar, spelling, and punctuation. I also asked the tool to help me shape it into the form of a blog post. I then edited the text, added links, and added images and captions.